<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A bit chilly in a hot place; a distributable Java JRE and JDK arrives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yepthatsme.com/2006/05/16/a-bit-chilly-in-a-hot-place-a-distributable-java-jre-and-jdk-arrives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yepthatsme.com/2006/05/16/a-bit-chilly-in-a-hot-place-a-distributable-java-jre-and-jdk-arrives/</link>
	<description>the craft of software development, free/open source software advocacy, and the rest of life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:47:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon Phipps</title>
		<link>http://www.yepthatsme.com/2006/05/16/a-bit-chilly-in-a-hot-place-a-distributable-java-jre-and-jdk-arrives/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 04:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yepthatsme.com/2006/05/16/a-bit-chilly-in-a-hot-place-a-distributable-java-jre-and-jdk-arrives/#comment-324</guid>
		<description>Barry:  A pleasure working with you too!

Jay:  Yep, sorry it&#039;s not Free yet - working on that ;-)   With respect to other systems such as *BSD, the problem is that it&#039;s not just a matter of distribution of existing binary bits, so I couldn&#039;t do the &quot;easy&quot; fix to the distribution license to provide a palliative for the interim. Rest assured that the *BSDs are next on my list to address - I welcome contacts to help discuss the issue regardless of the kernel in use, please send me private mail to webmink-at-sun-dot-com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry:  A pleasure working with you too!</p>
<p>Jay:  Yep, sorry it&#8217;s not Free yet &#8211; working on that ;-)   With respect to other systems such as *BSD, the problem is that it&#8217;s not just a matter of distribution of existing binary bits, so I couldn&#8217;t do the &#8220;easy&#8221; fix to the distribution license to provide a palliative for the interim. Rest assured that the *BSDs are next on my list to address &#8211; I welcome contacts to help discuss the issue regardless of the kernel in use, please send me private mail to webmink-at-sun-dot-com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.yepthatsme.com/2006/05/16/a-bit-chilly-in-a-hot-place-a-distributable-java-jre-and-jdk-arrives/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 03:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yepthatsme.com/2006/05/16/a-bit-chilly-in-a-hot-place-a-distributable-java-jre-and-jdk-arrives/#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Jay,
Looks like your other comment came before I posted mine!  The network was down for 45 minutes here at &lt;a href=&quot;http://debconf6.debconf.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DebConf&lt;/a&gt;; sorry for the delay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay,<br />
Looks like your other comment came before I posted mine!  The network was down for 45 minutes here at <a href="http://debconf6.debconf.org" rel="nofollow">DebConf</a>; sorry for the delay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.yepthatsme.com/2006/05/16/a-bit-chilly-in-a-hot-place-a-distributable-java-jre-and-jdk-arrives/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 03:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yepthatsme.com/2006/05/16/a-bit-chilly-in-a-hot-place-a-distributable-java-jre-and-jdk-arrives/#comment-295</guid>
		<description>Jay,

Hi!  Thanks for commenting.  You are correct; the new packages from Sun are not free as defined by the DFSG.  In fact, they are not free as defined by most anyone.  That&#039;s why noone who knows what they are talking about should have posted anything to that nature, though I have already seen some half-informed and misleading blog posts as early as last night.

Also, note that the JRE and JDK are in non-free, not contrib.  Those are two distinct &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.us.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-sections&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sections as defined by Debian Policy&lt;/a&gt;.  As you point out, they are both not part of Debian proper, which is the section referred to as main.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay,</p>
<p>Hi!  Thanks for commenting.  You are correct; the new packages from Sun are not free as defined by the DFSG.  In fact, they are not free as defined by most anyone.  That&#8217;s why noone who knows what they are talking about should have posted anything to that nature, though I have already seen some half-informed and misleading blog posts as early as last night.</p>
<p>Also, note that the JRE and JDK are in non-free, not contrib.  Those are two distinct <a href="http://www.us.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-sections" rel="nofollow">sections as defined by Debian Policy</a>.  As you point out, they are both not part of Debian proper, which is the section referred to as main.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Carlson</title>
		<link>http://www.yepthatsme.com/2006/05/16/a-bit-chilly-in-a-hot-place-a-distributable-java-jre-and-jdk-arrives/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Carlson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 02:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yepthatsme.com/2006/05/16/a-bit-chilly-in-a-hot-place-a-distributable-java-jre-and-jdk-arrives/#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Oh, silly me.  I meant to say &quot;I welcome the JDK to non-free&quot;.  It&#039;s been a while; my apologies.

So what are hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-gnu supposed to do?  Aren&#039;t we the universal operating system?

It&#039;s nice that Sun&#039;s making it easier for so-called &quot;Linux&quot; operating systems to distribute closed-source binaries of the JDK; don&#039;t get me wrong.  But I&#039;m still waiting for Sun to close on their promises to promote an *open* system.

I guess I can see Sun&#039;s point of view.  After all, there are hundreds of distinct forks of perl, and the lack of WORA there has destroyed perl as a critical component of Internet infrastructure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, silly me.  I meant to say &#8220;I welcome the JDK to non-free&#8221;.  It&#8217;s been a while; my apologies.</p>
<p>So what are hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-gnu supposed to do?  Aren&#8217;t we the universal operating system?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice that Sun&#8217;s making it easier for so-called &#8220;Linux&#8221; operating systems to distribute closed-source binaries of the JDK; don&#8217;t get me wrong.  But I&#8217;m still waiting for Sun to close on their promises to promote an *open* system.</p>
<p>I guess I can see Sun&#8217;s point of view.  After all, there are hundreds of distinct forks of perl, and the lack of WORA there has destroyed perl as a critical component of Internet infrastructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Carlson</title>
		<link>http://www.yepthatsme.com/2006/05/16/a-bit-chilly-in-a-hot-place-a-distributable-java-jre-and-jdk-arrives/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Carlson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 02:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yepthatsme.com/2006/05/16/a-bit-chilly-in-a-hot-place-a-distributable-java-jre-and-jdk-arrives/#comment-292</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not DFSG-free.

First, the license has no definition of what Linux really is.  That license sez &quot;&#039;Operating System&#039; means any version of the Linux or OpenSolaris operating systems&quot;, but as we&#039;re all aware by now, Linux is a kernel, not an operating system.

And second, as a generalization, Sun doesn&#039;t understand what Open Source means.  &quot;Open Source Means No Control&quot; (paraphrasing jwz). This means that if I think Sun has made a stupid mistake, I don&#039;t have to ask their permission before fixing it.  Regardless of whether it&#039;s in Sun&#039;s strategic interest for nobody to be able to fix that mistake.

That doesn&#039;t mean my fix is right, but it does mean that Sun can&#039;t extinguish anyone&#039;s efforts, right or wrong, on the basis of &quot;ownership&quot;.  Other people are smart too.

I welcome the JDK to contrib.  But contrib is not part of Debian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not DFSG-free.</p>
<p>First, the license has no definition of what Linux really is.  That license sez &#8220;&#8216;Operating System&#8217; means any version of the Linux or OpenSolaris operating systems&#8221;, but as we&#8217;re all aware by now, Linux is a kernel, not an operating system.</p>
<p>And second, as a generalization, Sun doesn&#8217;t understand what Open Source means.  &#8220;Open Source Means No Control&#8221; (paraphrasing jwz). This means that if I think Sun has made a stupid mistake, I don&#8217;t have to ask their permission before fixing it.  Regardless of whether it&#8217;s in Sun&#8217;s strategic interest for nobody to be able to fix that mistake.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean my fix is right, but it does mean that Sun can&#8217;t extinguish anyone&#8217;s efforts, right or wrong, on the basis of &#8220;ownership&#8221;.  Other people are smart too.</p>
<p>I welcome the JDK to contrib.  But contrib is not part of Debian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
